APOLOGIA
Okay. So here's the basic Gemma Files fanfic FAQ, which usually boils
down to two simple questions: Why (mainly) write fanfic about OZ, in the
first place? And given the range of intense, interesting, exciting characters
from OZ that I COULD be playing with, *why*--for the love of God, Montressor--do
I find (mainly) writing fic from the point of view of someone like Vern
Schillinger [as embodied by character actor J.K. Simmons, who probably
finds having finally gained late-life "fame" as a neo-Nazi prison rapist
a pretty mixed blessing at best] attractive, let alone excusable?
OZ, created for HBO by writer/director/producer
Tom Fontana (previously responsible for such challenging, cult-worthy
primetime shows as St. ELSEWHERE and HOMICIDE: LIFE ON THE STREET), is
a no-holds-barred look at hard times doing hard time...a Ground Zero-level
view of life in Emerald City, the experimental wing of a made-up prison
called the Oswald Maximum Security Correctional Facility. Inmates at Oz
range from supposedly-meek rich-boy former lawyer Tobias Beecher [Lee
Tergesen], in for three to twelve on a first offense conviction for vehicular
manslaughter (while driving under the influence, he hit-and-ran a twelve-year-old
girl riding home on her bike), to charming lowlife borderline sociopath
Christopher Keller [Christopher Meloni], who robbed a bodega and committed
two counts of felony murder, thus netting himself a cool eighty-eight
years (up for parole in fifty).
During his first few days in Oz, Beecher's total
lack of street smarts--possibly allied with a certain innate self-destructive
streak--made him easy meat for the attentions of Vern Schillinger [J.K.
Simmons], leader of Oz's Aryan Brotherhood, in for five to eight for beating
up a (black) pusher who sold drugs to his sons. After switching cells
ostensibly to *avoid* getting raped only to end up with a swastika branded
on his ass, Beecher spent most of Season One as Vern's "prag", his chosen
jailhouse punk/"wife"--bullied, humiliated, forced to lick Vern's boots,
dress in partial drag and give up most of his straight masculine self-image.
Eventually, Beecher's downward plunge ended when cellblock Machiavel/self-proclaimed
Lord Of The Dance Ryan O'Reily [Dean Winters] slipped him some angel dust;
Beecher accessed his inner rage and threw a chair through Vern's (plexiglass)
cell wall, leaving him scarred and partially blind in one eye. Later,
he confirmed his escape from pragdom by knocking Vern down and taking
a crap on his face. The vendetta between them has been on ever since.
The big development in said vendetta came in
Season Two, when Vern sicced Keller--then a new arrival, but one who also
happened to be one of Vern's former prags--on the now tough and crazy
Beecher, arranging to get him assigned as Beecher's new cellmate. Keller
worked his seductive wiles, leaving Beecher freshly confused about his
sexuality and ripe for a re-descent into alcohol, then capped the deal
off by helping Vern break Beecher's arms and legs. As Season Three began,
however, Keller decided he really *did* love Beecher, and spent most of
the rest of that arc trying to get Beecher to believe it by aiding him
in his continuing feud with Vern. By the end of Season Three, Keller had
helped Beecher (inadvertantly) arrange for the death of Vern's son, Andy--granted,
the kid actually died from overdosing on drugs *Vern*, Oz's resident postmaster,
had sent to him through the mail...but it was still Beecher's FAULT, at
least in Vern's eyes--and Keller and Beecher consummated their courtship
during an extended New Year's lock-down, becoming publicly acknowledged
lovers.
With the first part of Season Four, the V/B/K
mate-or-murder-go-round has continued to twist and turn, spiralling steadily
outward--much like the rest of OZ's intertwined storylines--in an endlessly
unfolding moral and psychosexual fractal pattern. Vern still wants Beecher:
Supposedly dead, possibly back--*his*, either way. Beecher still can't
go more than a few episodes without taking an energizing, hate-filled
pull off the old Vern-pipe. And Keller is still enmeshed with both of
them, obsessed with proving he's a better "Daddy" than Vern ever was by
retaining his hold on Beecher; the New Year's honeymoon was basically
over in episode one, when Keller called Beecher a bitch for wanting--albeit
momentarily--to forgive Vern his trespasses. Since then, the fallout has
cost Beecher a son himself and left he and Keller estranged, for the moment.
Vern, meanwhile, just gloats...and waits.
The "why" of me writing OZ, therefore, should
be obvious. The show's a winning combination of modern-day revenge tragedy
and full-bore homoerotic soap opera which provides almost journalistically
accurate insight into today's burgeoning "penitentiary culture", yet still
remains innately theatrical, hyperkinetic and addictive--no good deed
goes unpunished in Em City, while the pros and cons of institutionalization
vs. self-revelation are carved out daily in flesh, blood, sweat, tears
and every other bodily fluid imaginable. Some people find the particular
trip down the Yellow Brick Road too assaultive to bear, others exhilarating
beyond belief; I find it both, and am continually inspired by and fascinated
with its underlying message that people placed under inhumane pressure
inevitably find themselves mutating into the most clarified, polarized
version of whatever--good OR bad--they already had the most potential
to become.
Even my most devoted fellow Oz-watchers, however,
are far more likely to focus on the gorgeously dysfunctional dynamics
of the Beecher/Keller melange than they are to spend much time trying
to figure out what makes a "monster" like Vern tick...or what conflicted
impulses keep he and Beecher locked in their decaying mutual orbit, for
that matter. B and K are youngish, comparatively conventionally attractive
guys who've been actually allowed to kiss and fondle on national TV, after
all; Vern's just a formerly fat, middle-aged man with a disproportionately
sonorous voice and ugly "beliefs", a ruthless and hypocritical career
predator who's done horrible things and never implied he was sorry for
any of them. Never mind that Beech, for all his cute initial helplessness,
is more and more looking like the skanky, cross-addicted prison version
of the cold corporate viper he must surely have been on the outside, or
that Keller's already confessed to considering himself "a piece of shit"
whose emotional choices can only embrace either unconditional surrender
or unconditional love, serial marriage or serial murder...
Well, this may be an apologia, but I'm definitely
no apologist: I've never wanted to "justify" Vern, or his actions. I've
simply always been fascinated by the slim, slim margin separating people
who self-identify as "good" from everybody else--my true slasher roots
lie in the tension between action-movie heroes and villains, all the way
up from STREETS OF FIRE through RICOCHET through FACE/OFF--as well as
the truly amazing lengths people of every possible stripe and stamp will
go to in order to justify their own actions to themselves.
When I began writing MY WIFE AND MY DEAD WIFE,
my first piece of OZfic, I knew that the main thing I wanted to do was
get deeper into the fucked-up "relationship" between Vern and Beecher
than Tom Fontana's sense of pacing could really allow for. I remember
being inspired by a comment/question posted by another visitor to Susan
Hudgens' Unofficial OZ Website Forum: "What would life under Vern"--so
to speak--"really have been like, 24-7?" Not just during rape, or violence,
but during those pauses where you're just two people linked in grotesque
intimacy, sharing a pod [Oz slang for cell]. I remember replying that
I thought it would probably have been most like a really bad arranged
marriage, where--no matter the circumstances--there would always be these
little moments of detente and teamwork, a confusing occasional feeling
of being less owned than joined at the hip. Of being...partners.
Around the same time, I started doing research
on prison "romances", especially the traditional Daddy/punk relationship
model Vern and Beecher's vendetta evolved from: Physical protection in
return for sexual satisfaction, with one person retaining the status of
a Man (a "pitcher" or "jocker", understood to be just a horny heterosexual
getting his wick dipped any way he can) while the other becomes a sort
of substitute woman or "catcher", a rare and much-sought-after prison
commodity, and can never escape that label as long as he's still inside
the system. As OZ narrator Augustus Hill [Harold Perrineau Jnr.] notes
in episode two, Season One, if you make a man your prag, "you own him
for life."
Life, a four-letter word, much like love, or
hate, or fuck. Or wife.
Most articles on the subject, however, do stress
that punkdom is usually a quasi-consensual arrangement--in that, after
an initial coercive turning-out, Men will compete between themselves for
a punk's undivided loyalty, cutting deals as elaborate as civillian pre-nuptual
agreements to get it--and can even be reciprocal, mutually sexually satisfying,
or emotionally rewarding. Vern's methodology therefore seems deviant from
the norm, as presented in canon; by going into his arrangement with Beecher
in a purely antagonistic way, he essentially sets himself up for a resultant
string of disasters. Why?
Personally, I think the answer has a lot to do
with Vern's own shaky sense of his essential sexuality: He's smart and
experienced, but he's been in jail for so much of his life that he's having
a hell of a time maintaining the illusion that he's NOT functionally bisexual.
So he goes overboard to maintain his unbendable alpha-male self-image,
requiring an imitation of femininity from his prags that's almost satirical,
rewarding "girly", submissive behavior, and only slamming down hard whenever
he's contradicted.
But with Beecher, constant submission seemed
to make Vern disengage entirely, leading directly to the angel dust episode:
Vern tells Beecher he's through with him even though Beecher's always
done everything he's ordered him to, sends him off to find another Daddy
or (possibly literally) die, so Beecher goes straight to O'Reily for a
shot of instant courage, and lashes out at Vern for breaking their "deal"
by changing the rules mid-game. Essentially, no matter what Vern says,
I think he knows Beecher isn't really cut out to be a "woman"--and essentially,
I don't think he wants him to be. Thus the unnecessary coerciveness, as
though he *wanted* to put as much pressure on Beecher as possible, just
see what would happen.
Season One Vern had no RESPECT for Season One
Beecher, but post-Season One Vern has real evidence that Beecher was always
smarter and has a lot more spine than he ever gave him credit for--in
a fucked-up way, getting publicly screwed by Beecher may have finally
gotten Vern truly interested in him as a potential mate, rather than a
simple sperm depository. Not that he can ever say that right out, mind
you, considering that--at this point--reciprocation would look like weakness
on his part, sheer perversity on Beecher's. And so the beat goes on.
Beecher's hatred for Vern is the one true constant
of Oz, far more than his "love" for Keller--which is why, though I'm glad
for Beecher/Keller in that I applaud anyone having good, hot sex (especially
two good, hot guys), I still maintain that Vern is definitely the person
Beecher has real "issues" with. Their combat/chemistry is what really
keeps Beecher going; it's a root addiction, as all-consuming as any of
Beecher's other little habits...not to mention being both cheaper and
more available than booze, to boot.
Meanwhile, whenever I look at Beecher, I continue
to see him as a far more loose and slippery person than Vern--not only
because he's learned the hard way that it's in his own best interest to
bend or be crushed, but because I think the buttoned-down surface he had
to maintain on the outside was the primary reason behind his drinking
problem. Drunk, or high, or crazy, Beecher inevitably gets this nasty
sexualization thing going--flirtatious, "bitchy", out of control, aggressive,
as though he's accessing a whole hidden section of himself--and Vern is
*definitely* the trigger. And because there's no softer side involved,
no real emotional vulnerability (as there IS with Keller), he can go further
with Vern than with anyone else-- each comes to the table loaded with
intelligence and need, neither will back down, and they're both equally
inventive. It's like they HAVE to keep picking the scab, to make sure
their shared wound stays open and unhealed.
For me, a big component of Beecher's continued
guilt/self-hatred around the whole Vern issue can also be traced back
to a talk he has with Oz's resident nun/psychiatrist Sister Peter Marie
in episode six or seven of Season Two, during which he makes a clear distinction
between sex with another man and love with another man (ie, Keller) by
saying: "I HAD sex with Schillinger--it was brutal, UNloving." *Not* "unfulfilling",
or "I couldn't come 'cause it hurt too much", or whatever. Which really
hints at a pattern of complicity-through-unexpected-pleasure which only
something like fanfic can ever really explore in full, eh...detail.
Part of Beecher's problem, to me, seems to be
caught up with his closeted sensualist nature--boring on the outside,
open-all-access on the in-. In a very real way--though this condones nothing--I
think he WANTS, on some level, to be "forced" to respond, either by alcohol,
drugs or someone else who can read his mind and give him what he's too
outwardly straight to say he wants or needs: Keller, now, for certain.
But maybe--Vern, then?
And granted, I'm working (by now) as much from
my own fanon as from true Oz canon anyway, tending to interpret things
in the light of the background I've made up for "my" Vern, but even in
canon, though, I think it's been pretty much established that Vern--who
enjoys "the power part" of sex so much--always finds ways to treat his
intimates as badly as he does himself. Obviously, what he wants is a kind
of make-believe family, with Beech playing wife *and* child, to be petted
or corrected at will--and why? Because his family's the only thing we've
ever seen him get passionate about, and he NEEDS an outlet for that passion
beyond the usual cold, calculated, jizz-gettin' and -keepin' machinations
of the A.B. in specific and Oz in general.
Thus, to my mind, his Daddy-like benevolence
towards Keller, even though prags aren't really supposed to "outgrow"
their cum-rag status; Chris gave him what he wanted, then graduated, but
still accords him his proper respect (or did, 'till he started poaching
on Vern's long-distance property). And for all that he said he was going
to make Beecher suffer, then kill him, his setting Keller on him still
highly stinks of trying to restart their former "relationship" by going
in through the back door (so's to speak). It's about doing by proxy what
he couldn't do in person: Getting Beecher to depend on HIM for sexual
*and* emotional intimacy, the way it should have been from the start--a
"normal" relationship, or as close as Vern's capable of coming to one.
Vern's curse is that he can only "love" what
he perceives as an extension of himself--his family, his property, his
gang, his race, his Cause. But his version of love is hollow, even on
this level, because--though, again, he'd never admit it--he doesn't really
love himself, or consider himself worthy OF love. Canonically, this is
highly hinted at, though never directly confirmed; one look at Vern's
less-than-amicable dealings with his father Heinrick certainly raise a
few theories as to why. And that's where he and Beecher meet, time after
time after time: A tangled, punitive web of mutual self-loathing made
flesh, impossible to re-make, running its course as an eternally shared
will to mutually assured (self-) destruction.
That's what I see, and that's what I like. So
that's what I write about, mainly, switching my monster-masks back and
forth to play predator or victim or victim/predator in turn. A small,
twisted specialty, yet mine own.
Now: You wanna just stand there watching, or
do you wanna play? Your choice, 'course...
...cupcake.
|